Bare_Truth wrote:Well I thought that is what I was trying to do with the reference to the title and my header about getting back to the issue of the originating post.bn2bnude wrote:Rather than making the topic something generic and trying to guide it, maybe it should be changed.
Perhaps you could elaborate on what you had in mind. My comments about the generic mechanism used were intended to illuminate the issue of free exercise of religion and the either deliberate or careless use of language which endangers the existence of true freedom in religious exercise.
The title and the original post seem to point to those (in this case, those you deem liberal) who redefine terms in order to change the meaning of terms by obfuscating the real meanings...
It seems from later posts that you really want to criticize certain "agendas" which you do not agree with.